![]() I've run teams that have used git how you are describing, always making people use rebase (in this case it was because we were syncing to SVN). If you really want a straight-line for your repos, why aren't you using something like SVN? Is the distributed nature of git really the big selling factor? Yes, your repo looks messier, but it more accurately reflects the lifecycle of the code, and what the developer intended at each commit. Git rebase destroys the context of the commit, leaving basically a diff apply instead of the much more contextually rich merge commit. This doesn't show up on a smaller repo, but if you have a busy repo, with lots of contributers, untangling a mess becomes much harder if you no longer have the true parentage of a given commit. The problem with rebase is that it corrupts the true history of the commits. Rebasing local history is OK (it's more than OK, it's sometimes necessary to maintain a clean history), but changing other people commits history is considered a bad practice. I DO NOT encourage rebasing remote (public or shared) branches. NOTE: Because of many discussions about this note. To get to the next batch of conflicts (if you have any). If you want to merge a feature branch it might be wiser to actually merge your commits thus having a single point of integration of two distinct branches.Īlso the conflict resolving will be now per commit basis, not everything-at-once, so you will have to use git rebase -continue The command will apply all your yet-to-be-pushed commits on top of the remote tree commits allowing your commits to be straight in a row and without branches (easier git bisects, yay!).įew notes though. To keep the repository clean, your commits always on top of the tree until you push them to a remote server. You actually issuing git fetch + git merge commands, which will result with an extra commit and ugly merge bubbles in your commit log (check out gitk to see them). What you might not know is that by typing git pull ![]() When working on a project you usually synchronize your code by pulling it several times a day. Although I did create an app that allows you generate ObjectId compatible values (see it here Mongo ObjectId Generator).Īll the test and a quick explanation of what we’re doing and why we’re doing it, culminating in our glorious use of fineProperty, is on GitHub /HugoDF/mock-mongo-object-id. ![]() We don’t want actual ObjectIds strewn around our code. It’s useful to testing code that uses things like Mongo’s ObjectId. That’s great for setting functions as method mocks. The gist of fineProperty use with a function value boils down to:Ĭonst obj = console.log(obj.yes()) // false or true depending on the call :D As you can see, the yes property is not enumerated, but it does exist. non-enumerable properties that are functions. This post goes through how to use fineProperty to mock how constructors create methods, ie. #javascript JavaScript fineProperty for a function: create mock object instances in Jest or AVA Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart. No rebase(s): merge the remote branch into local We’re now going to explore how to achieve a state in the local branch where the remote won’t reject the push. How can you get your local branch back to a state that’s pushable? These 2 cases should be dealt with differently. ![]() There tend to be 2 types of changes to the remote branch: someone added commits or someone modified the history of the branch (usually some sort of rebase). “the tip of your current branch is behind its remote counterpart” means that there have been changes on the remote branch that you don’t have locally. Remotes are useful to share your work or collaborate on a branch. a GitHub/GitLab/BitBucket/self-hosted Git server repository instance). A remote equates roughly to a place where you git repository is hosted (eg. A remote branch is one that exists on the remote location (most repositories usually have a remote called origin). A local branch is a branch that exists in your local version of the git repository. Git works with the concept of local and remote branches. What causes ”tip of your current branch is behind”?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |